Advocate notice
Alleging that the State Govt has not respected the ruling of the Supre-me Court to compen-sate five candidates of MBBS/BDS entrance examination of 2003/ 2004 who were wrongly denied admission and were later given admis-sion after a gap of three years, the JAC on the Selection of Govt Nomi-nees for Admission to MBBS/BDS Course has served Advocate notices to the Chief Secretary, Health Commissioner and Health Director. The Supreme Court in its earlier ruling on September 27, 2003 had directed the State respondent to pay a compensation of Rs 25000 to the five candidates as fines. However the ruling of the SC has not been honoured till date, said the JAC and warned that if the matter is not addressed to satisfactorily within 40 days time then a civil suit will be filed.
Alleging that the State Govt has not respected the ruling of the Supre-me Court to compen-sate five candidates of MBBS/BDS entrance examination of 2003/ 2004 who were wrongly denied admission and were later given admis-sion after a gap of three years, the JAC on the Selection of Govt Nomi-nees for Admission to MBBS/BDS Course has served Advocate notices to the Chief Secretary, Health Commissioner and Health Director. The Supreme Court in its earlier ruling on September 27, 2003 had directed the State respondent to pay a compensation of Rs 25000 to the five candidates as fines. However the ruling of the SC has not been honoured till date, said the JAC and warned that if the matter is not addressed to satisfactorily within 40 days time then a civil suit will be filed.
0 comments:
Post a Comment